6 Results
6.1 RQ1. Reasons for Constructing Induction Support Systems
In answering the first research question, I found three reasons that early career teachers construct induction support systems: change, scarcity of resources, and conflicting teaching beliefs. These themes were discussed by multiple interviewees (Table 2).
Table 2. Reasons for Constructing Induction Support Systems
Reason | Amelia | Anne | Blair | Hallie | Julie | Mike | Simone | Taylor | Wallace |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Scarcity of resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Conflicting teaching beliefs |
|
|
|
|
6.1.1 Change
Although some of the changes, disruptions, and uncertainty experienced by early career teachers are inevitable parts of transitioning into a new career, all but two early career teachers identified additional challenges related to this theme. Several interviewees described these changes in representative ways. For instance, Simone noted that the field of education is constantly in flux, and so inevitably there are additional professional development sessions to attend. Anne and Simone were both handed new curricula each year, and to them it felt like the process of adjusting to a new plan never seemed to stop. Although summer planning seemed to help, Amelia, as an itinerant music teacher, did not receive her final teaching assignments until October. Meanwhile, Julie and Wallace started their teaching careers mid-year, so they entered situations where students’ experiences had been disrupted by the previous teacher’s departure. As a final example, Anne experienced a high degree of personnel turnover in her under-resourced school, even in her first few years of teaching. She had to adjust to a new principal at the start of her third year, and her grade-level partner teacher also left in the middle of that year.
6.1.2 Scarcity of Resources
Most early career teachers constructed induction support systems because of a scarcity of resources. This theme was particularly pronounced for two teachers: Anne and Amelia described numerous challenges related to scarcity: absence of curriculum, missing classroom materials, poor physical conditions in the school, and a limited budget for teaching supplies. The physical environment in Anne’s school created an especially difficult setting for work. Her classroom, a modular trailer, lacked insulation to keep out cold Midwestern U.S. winter winds and hosted bugs, requiring her to store personal belongings in sealable plastic bags during the day. Amelia, as an itinerant music teacher serving several schools in a suburban district, lacked a home classroom and had to teach with whatever supplies she could carry around with her.
6.1.3 Conflicting Teaching Beliefs
Nearly half of early career teachers also described tension between their previously held beliefs about teaching and those encountered in the schools where they worked. Several of their comments were representative. For instance, Julie experienced dissonance with her school’s strict policy on classroom management and student discipline, and she voiced her concerns to her principal:
I’m only going to do RTC [Responsible Thinking Classroom] when it gets to this point. I’m not going to do RTC every single day. That’s just not something that I can justify. And for a lot of those kids, it doesn’t work. I don’t really see the success in it.
Hallie, in her first year as a teacher, described conflict with more experienced colleagues: “I have one teacher who just wants to use curriculum from 30 years ago. And I’m just like, ‘I can’t do it.’ There are just completely irrelevant things.” Hallie also advocated for the inclusion of more anti-racism materials throughout the year, not just confined to Black History Month in February.
6.2 RQ2. Tools in Early Career Teachers’ Induction Support Systems
In answering the second research question, I found three categories discussed by each interviewee: tools for planning, tools for enacting practice, and tools for connecting socially. Each of these categories was voiced by all interviewees (Table 3). These tools were all self-directed (i.e., voluntary and informal), meaning that early career teachers pursued them in addition to required induction programs (e.g., district professional development workshops, assigned mentor teachers, professional learning communities). Wallace articulated why he put in the extra work: “I just can’t think of a time that I didn’t ask someone for help… I can’t think of any time that I would just fail and just accept it and not reach out.” In the following paragraphs, I describe these tools in more detail.
Table 3. Tools in Early Career Teachers’ Induction Support Systems
Tools | Amelia | Anne | Blair | Hallie | Julie | Mike | Simone | Taylor | Wallace |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enacting practice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecting socially |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.1 Tools for Planning
Each interviewee described seeking planning tools, which included generating ideas, creating curriculum, writing lesson plans, and finding appropriate resources. For instance, Taylor and Blair, the only two interviewees without undergraduate teacher preparation, struggled with creating a semester-long teaching plan. As a result, they sought supports earlier in the planning process, asking for help from their in-school professional learning communities and social media connections. The remaining interviewees did have undergraduate training, but they also had difficulty in planning. For instance, because her district did not assign a set curriculum to follow, Hallie wrestled internally when planning: “What am I supposed to do? Like, what do you actually want me to do?” She also acknowledged the openness of her colleagues, but limitations remained: “There are teachers that are willing to help, but because my team doesn’t do a lot of the actual same activity, it doesn’t really help to share planning resources, always.” Hallie made some decisions independently, and at times she also turned to social media for supports. Taking a slightly different approach than the other interviewees, Julie tended to look for supports toward the end of her planning process. She turned to social media to refine an existing plan to add “some extra TeachersPayTeachers flair.”
Some early career teachers also struggled with the opposite problem: having too many planning resources. This necessitated navigating an overwhelming number of possibilities of what and how to teach. At times, interviewees found themselves inundated with unfiltered ideas and resources from school colleagues. For instance, Julie described the effect of being offered too much planning help: “I felt like a lot of teachers were saying, ‘Here, try this. Here, try this.’ And I didn’t really have the time to fully plan out units or plan out weeks at all.” Julie said she would have preferred to access planning supports only when she needed them, rather than the overwhelming, unidirectional flow of ideas from colleagues to her.
6.2.2 Tools for Enacting Practice
All interviewees also sought tools for enacting practice, looking to improve instruction and interactions with students in the classroom. For instance, Amelia, Anne, and Julie each talked extensively with colleagues, mentor teachers, and principals about difficult classroom management situations they had encountered and how they navigated these. As another representative example, Hallie discussed with her professional learning community “embedding real learning ideas” in discussions of current events like voting instead of abstractly “reading a story and making it work with a standard.” She observed that the process of improving her teaching practice benefited both her and her students: “I enjoy my job a lot more teaching real things, and I think students come away with it more than just memorizing, and being able to do a standard on a standardized test.” Early career teachers also went to social media occasionally for tools for enacting practice. For instance, Taylor found YouTube videos to be especially useful for demonstrating activities to her physical education (PE) classes.
6.3 RQ3. People in Early Career Teachers’ Induction Support Systems
In answering the third research question, I found that early career teachers connected with people both within their local school as well as beyond when constructing support systems during induction. These relational themes were discussed by each interviewee (Table 4), and I describe them further in the following paragraphs.
Table 4. People in Early Career Teachers’ Induction Support Systems
People | Amelia | Anne | Blair | Hallie | Julie | Mike | Simone | Taylor | Wallace |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In-school |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Out-of-school |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3.1 In-school Connections
Each interviewee connected with colleagues inside their school building when constructing induction support systems. These people were associated with formally required parts of their support systems (e.g., mentor teachers, professional learning communities) as well as informal opportunities voluntarily initiated by the early career teacher, such as talking to colleagues in the teachers’ lounge. Occasionally, these in-school relationships were reinforced through social media platforms (e.g., Blair and Wallace connected with coworkers on Facebook).
6.3.2 Out-of-school Connections
Each early career teacher also connected with people beyond their school buildings, whether local or more far-reaching, when constructing induction support systems. Some districts required formal gatherings for early career teachers, such as district-wide professional development workshops. Amelia’s district offered optional connections through a district-wide Facebook group for sharing resources and a Microsoft Teams account where teachers could talk between official meetings. More than half of the early career teachers interviewed (Amelia, Anne, Hallie, Mike, and Wallace) had friends and family members who were also educators, and they would look to these personal connections for informal support.
Interviewees also joined groups organized to support teachers. For example, during her undergraduate years, Simone became a member of a sorority for African American women, and after graduation, she continued to attend local gatherings of sorority sisters in her city. Many sorority members are also teachers, and Simone found them to be an important source of emotional and professional encouragement as she started teaching. Mike was a member of a national organization that provided focused professional development for early career teachers, and he also regularly attended a local gathering of early career teachers that was organized in partnership between his district and the teacher preparation program at the nearby university. These examples are types of distributed networks, which extend beyond a teacher’s school building but still rely on face-to-face meetups.
Finally, interviewees often connected with people online as part of constructing their induction support systems. They looked to social media for opportunities to vent their frustrations, seek solidarity, exchange ideas, and find resources — often with an explicit appreciation that these connections were not local.