+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

Module 5: Work Analysis

EME5601: Introduction to Instructional Systems

Dr. Bret Staudt Willet

October 16, 2024

1 / 39

View the slides:

bretsw.com/eme5601-fs24-module5

2 / 39



Module 4
Recap

3 / 39

Needs Assessment

Needs assessment is the first step in an iterative design cycle:

Figure 2.1 from Rothwell et al. (2016, p. 20)

4 / 39



Gap =

[What is] - [What should be]

5 / 39

Needs Assessment

6 / 39

Needs Assessment

  • Direct + Indirect Costs
6 / 39

Needs Assessment

  • Direct + Indirect Costs

  • Timeline + Labor

6 / 39

Needs Assessment

Writing Objectives

  • Use Bloom's Taxonomy action verbs (worksheet)
7 / 39

Needs Assessment

Calculating Sample Size

8 / 39



Module 5
Work Analysis

9 / 39

Work Analysis

What is the work of a chef?

10 / 39

Work Analysis

What is the work of a chef? (I thought I wanted to be a chef.)

11 / 39



Performing Work Analysis

Rothwell & Kazanas, 2008 (Ch. 7)

13 / 39

Work Analysis

Figure 7.1from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 131)

14 / 39

Work Analysis

Table 7.2 from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 149)

15 / 39

Work Analysis

Table 7.2 from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 149)


Discuss in groups...

15 / 39

Work Analysis

16 / 39

Work Analysis

  • Job Analysis: systematic examination of what people do, how they do it, and what results they achieve by doing it
16 / 39

Work Analysis

  • Job Analysis: systematic examination of what people do, how they do it, and what results they achieve by doing it

    • Clarifies work titles, responsibilities, activities, and entry qualifications
16 / 39

Work Analysis

  • Task Analysis: intensive examination of how people perform work activities
17 / 39

Work Analysis

  • Task Analysis: intensive examination of how people perform work activities

    • Clarifies competent performance; which activities might be simplified or improved; what workers must know, do, or feel to learn a specific activity, conditions needed for competent performance; minimum expectations (i.e., standards)
17 / 39

Work Analysis

  • Content Analysis: examination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes to identify instructionally useful units (subject matter analysis)
18 / 39

Work Analysis

  • Content Analysis: examination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes to identify instructionally useful units (subject matter analysis)

    • Clarifies which topics or ideas should be included or excluded in instruction as well as how to sequence topics in instruction
18 / 39

Why Work Analysis?

Figure 7.2 from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 152)

19 / 39

Why Work Analysis?

Figure 7.2 from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 152)

  • Create or update position descriptions
19 / 39

Why Work Analysis?

Figure 7.2 from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 152)

  • Create or update position descriptions

  • Develop relevant and useful training

19 / 39

Why Work Analysis?

Figure 7.2 from Rothwell & Kazanas (2008, p. 152)

  • Create or update position descriptions

  • Develop relevant and useful training

  • Develop competency models

19 / 39



Job-Task Analysis: Which Way?

Hahn et al., 1995

20 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Traditional JTA

21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Traditional JTA

  • Create task list
21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Traditional JTA

  • Create task list

  • Interview those performing the work or their supervisors

21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Traditional JTA

  • Create task list

  • Interview those performing the work or their supervisors

  • Create questionnaire

21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Traditional JTA

  • Create task list

  • Interview those performing the work or their supervisors

  • Create questionnaire

  • Administer survey to all subject matter experts (both workers and supervisors)

21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Traditional JTA

  • Create task list

  • Interview those performing the work or their supervisors

  • Create questionnaire

  • Administer survey to all subject matter experts (both workers and supervisors)

  • Analyze frequency, difficulty, importance, and consequences of the task

21 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Tabletop (TTA)

22 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Tabletop (TTA)

  • Facilitator guides a small team of experts during round-robin (i.e., tabletop) discussions to obtain information about a particular job
22 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Tabletop (TTA)

  • Facilitator guides a small team of experts during round-robin (i.e., tabletop) discussions to obtain information about a particular job

  • No prior task list

22 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Tabletop (TTA)

  • Facilitator guides a small team of experts during round-robin (i.e., tabletop) discussions to obtain information about a particular job

  • No prior task list

  • The team brainstorms and selects tasks for training using a qualitative approach

22 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Tabletop (TTA)

  • Facilitator guides a small team of experts during round-robin (i.e., tabletop) discussions to obtain information about a particular job

  • No prior task list

  • The team brainstorms and selects tasks for training using a qualitative approach

  • Sort into training categories based on frequency, difficulty, importance, and consequences

22 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Hybrid JTA

23 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Hybrid JTA

  • Develop task list based on work-related materials
23 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Hybrid JTA

  • Develop task list based on work-related materials

  • Workers and supervisors review and modify the task list during a facilitated roundtable discussion

23 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Hybrid JTA

  • Develop task list based on work-related materials

  • Workers and supervisors review and modify the task list during a facilitated roundtable discussion

  • Participants come to consensus decisions on task ratings

23 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Hybrid JTA

  • Develop task list based on work-related materials

  • Workers and supervisors review and modify the task list during a facilitated roundtable discussion

  • Participants come to consensus decisions on task ratings

  • If time permits, iterate the process: participants review the task list independently after the group consensus, potentially soliciting the opinion of other experts

23 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Figure 1 from Hahn et al. (1995, p. 24)

24 / 39

Job-Task Analysis

Table 1 from Hahn et al. (1995, p. 27)

25 / 39



Review of Methods
to Identify the Critical Job-Tasks
Undertaken by
the Emergency Services

Nevola et al., 2019

26 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

  • Stage 1: Establish the critical job-tasks (i.e. job- analysis)
27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

  • Stage 1: Establish the critical job-tasks (i.e. job- analysis)

  • Stage2: Determine the method of best practice for undertaking the critical job-tasks

27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

  • Stage 1: Establish the critical job-tasks (i.e. job- analysis)

  • Stage2: Determine the method of best practice for undertaking the critical job-tasks

  • Stage 3: Agree the criteria-for, and acceptable minimum level of, job-task performance
27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

  • Stage 1: Establish the critical job-tasks (i.e. job- analysis)

  • Stage2: Determine the method of best practice for undertaking the critical job-tasks

  • Stage 3: Agree the criteria-for, and acceptable minimum level of, job-task performance

  • Stage 4: Determine the physical demands of the critical job-tasks

27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

  • Stage 1: Establish the critical job-tasks (i.e. job- analysis)

  • Stage2: Determine the method of best practice for undertaking the critical job-tasks

  • Stage 3: Agree the criteria-for, and acceptable minimum level of, job-task performance

  • Stage 4: Determine the physical demands of the critical job-tasks

  • Stage 5: Determine a reasonable maximum permissible relative workload

27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Process of Job-Task Analysis:

  • Stage 1: Establish the critical job-tasks (i.e. job- analysis)

  • Stage2: Determine the method of best practice for undertaking the critical job-tasks

  • Stage 3: Agree the criteria-for, and acceptable minimum level of, job-task performance

  • Stage 4: Determine the physical demands of the critical job-tasks

  • Stage 5: Determine a reasonable maximum permissible relative workload

  • Stage 6: Production of a valid minimum occupational fitness standard

27 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Insights from the Job-Task Analysis for Emergency Services:

28 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Insights from the Job-Task Analysis for Emergency Services:

  • Maintain robust and accessible information with which to describe their critical job-tasks
28 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Insights from the Job-Task Analysis for Emergency Services:

  • Maintain robust and accessible information with which to describe their critical job-tasks

  • Adopt a consistent approach (i.e. international standardization) to the development of performance standards which accurately reflect the combination of competencies required to safely and successfully conduct critical job-tasks

28 / 39

Identify Critical Job-Tasks

Insights from the Job-Task Analysis for Emergency Services:

  • Maintain robust and accessible information with which to describe their critical job-tasks

  • Adopt a consistent approach (i.e. international standardization) to the development of performance standards which accurately reflect the combination of competencies required to safely and successfully conduct critical job-tasks

  • Implement employment standards which incorporate the requirements of job-tasks that have been assessed to be critical to both present and likely future operational scenarios (e.g. informed by techniques such as wargaming).

28 / 39



Practice

29 / 39

Job Analysis Practice

Discuss in groups...

Describe your first job.

30 / 39

Task Analysis Practice

Discuss in groups...

Describe a task in the Innovation Hub.

31 / 39

Work Analysis Practice

What do you think your professors do?

  • Job analysis

  • Task analysis

  • Content analysis

32 / 39



Expanding the
ISD Analysis Toolbox

33 / 39

ISD Analysis Toolbox

  • Systems Analysis
  • Performance Analysis
  • Needs Assessment / Needs Analysis
  • Training Requirements Analysis
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Competency Assessment
  • Learner Assessment
  • Setting Analysis
  • Developmental Setting Assessment
  • Job Analysis
  • Task Analysis
  • Content (Subject Matter) Analysis
34 / 39



Looking ahead

35 / 39

Semester Schedule

  • Module 1: Introduction to Instructional Systems Design

  • Module 2: Systems Analysis

  • Module 3: ISD & HPT

  • Module 4: Needs Assessment

  • Module 5: Work Analysis

  • Module 6: Design & Development

  • Module 7: Evaluation

36 / 39

Major Assignments

  • Assignments (70%)

    • Module 2 Assignment: Systems Analysis paper (150 points)

    • Module 3 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 1 (50 points)

    • Module 4 Assignment: Needs Assessment paper (150 points)

    • Module 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 2 (50 points)

    • Module 6 Assignment: Work Analysis paper (150 points)

    • Module 7 Assignment: ISD Process Model paper (150 points)

37 / 39

Major Assignments

Invitation: Approach the Module 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 2 a bit differently

38 / 39

Major Assignments

Invitation: Approach the Module 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 2 a bit differently

Start with an article that is a bit over your head to read, such as Frank et al. (2023)

38 / 39

Major Assignments

Invitation: Approach the Module 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 2 a bit differently

Start with an article that is a bit over your head to read, such as Frank et al. (2023)

Use a little GenAI magic from Google's NotebookLM

38 / 39

Major Assignments

Invitation: Approach the Module 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 2 a bit differently

Start with an article that is a bit over your head to read, such as Frank et al. (2023)

Use a little GenAI magic from Google's NotebookLM

Listen to the recording at konfound-it.org

38 / 39

Major Assignments

Invitation: Approach the Module 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography 2 a bit differently

Start with an article that is a bit over your head to read, such as Frank et al. (2023)

Use a little GenAI magic from Google's NotebookLM

Listen to the recording at konfound-it.org

Write your annotated bibliography as a reflection on what you found interesting from the NotebookLM summary.

38 / 39



Questions


What questions can I answer for you now?

How can I support you this week?


bret.staudtwillet@fsu.edu | bretsw.com | GitHub

39 / 39

View the slides:

bretsw.com/eme5601-fs24-module5

2 / 39
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow